74
edits
Changes
Talk:Counterexamples to Relativity (view source)
Revision as of 17:40, October 16, 2011
, 17:40, October 16, 2011→Path Independence and Photons
::::::Please address my more substantive point: has your equation E<sup>2</sup>=(pc)<sup>2</sup>+(mc<sup>2</sup>)<sup>2</sup> been experimentally verified, or is it simply definitional?
::::::Please address my more substantive point: has your equation E<sup>2</sup>=(pc)<sup>2</sup>+(mc<sup>2</sup>)<sup>2</sup> been experimentally verified, or is it simply definitional?
:::::::First of all, will you please answer my question...? What is the vector field such that when one integrates over it, one gets time? And oops. Misread your question. And no, it's not "definitional," it's from the relativistic expressions of energy and momentum... (And yes, those have been experimentally verified--if I recall correctly, using those equations, you can predict what can happen (i.e. speeds) when elementary particles are created. But I'm not particle physicist) Once you have those, just do a little algebra and you get that equation. And I hope you're not going to deny basic algebra....
<br />
:::::::Again, all this is well known.... Out of curiosity have you ever actually studied relativity or this photon stuff? [[User:AndyFrankinson|AndyFrankinson]] 13:39, 16 October 2011 (EDT)
==FTL Neutrinos at LHC ==
==FTL Neutrinos at LHC ==