74
edits
Changes
Talk:Counterexamples to Relativity (view source)
Revision as of 23:53, October 16, 2011
, 23:53, October 16, 2011→A few sections that should be removed...
:Will review the other points later.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:45, 14 October 2011 (EDT)
:Will review the other points later.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:45, 14 October 2011 (EDT)
::I fully agree with all this. Some of the stuff in this page literally left my head hurting pretty badly from facepalming so hard.
::And, Schlafly, how does this make relativity wrong? Newtonian physics is wrong at quantum levels too. Should we add a "Counterexamples to Newtonian Mechanics" page and put something like that in there too? Of course not--it's an excellent approximation for things on the everyday scale. Same thing with GR.
::No, they were not developed because of relativity, but they were developed taking relativity into account. The people who built it didn't know the specifics, but they knew the corrections from relativity were there and they took them into account. [[User:AndyFrankinson|AndyFrankinson]] 19:53, 16 October 2011 (EDT)
== A couple more problems ==
== A couple more problems ==