Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,880
edits
Changes
Talk:Conservative Bible Project (view source)
Revision as of 18:34, October 24, 2011
, 18:34, October 24, 2011→Another reply to Andy Schlafly
Lastly, I still suggest consulting with the Wycliffe Bible translators (who appear not to require college education but merely equivalency plus use technology in their translation), better preparing your translators and requiring that all your translators be prepared. If you don't want to do that, I still suggest deleting the CBP as their is no shortcut to excellence and the Bible should be translated excellently. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:51, 24 October 2011 (EDT)
Lastly, I still suggest consulting with the Wycliffe Bible translators (who appear not to require college education but merely equivalency plus use technology in their translation), better preparing your translators and requiring that all your translators be prepared. If you don't want to do that, I still suggest deleting the CBP as their is no shortcut to excellence and the Bible should be translated excellently. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:51, 24 October 2011 (EDT)
::Andy, I revised my above post to provide an example of a relevant point. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 14:34, 24 October 2011 (EDT)
== Suggestion to Andy on proceeding forward if you wish to continue the wiki Bible translatiing project ==
== Suggestion to Andy on proceeding forward if you wish to continue the wiki Bible translatiing project ==