Difference between revisions of "Creation science"
From Conservapedia
(Remove opinion (see talk), copyedit) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{merge|Creation Science}} | {{merge|Creation Science}} | ||
| − | '''Creation science''' is an effort to show that scientific evidence is consistent with the account of Creation in the Bible | + | '''Creation science''' is an effort to show that scientific evidence is consistent with the account of Creation in the Bible—usually with a literal six-day-creation interpretation—and not with the [[Theory of evolution|theory of evolution]]. |
| − | + | Creation science is not accepted by most scientists, but this is claimed to be due partly to the religious views of the scientists, rather than scientific evidences{{fact}}. | |
| + | A poll among United States scientists showed approximately 45% of scientists believed there was no God.[http://www.ovpr.uga.edu/researchnews/97su/faith.html] In addition, a survey found that 93% of the scientists who were members of the [[United States National Academy of Sciences]] do not believe there is a God. [http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v394/n6691/full/394313a0.html] | ||
Revision as of 02:55, April 12, 2007
It has been suggested that this article or section be merged with Creation Science. (Discuss)
Creation science is an effort to show that scientific evidence is consistent with the account of Creation in the Bible—usually with a literal six-day-creation interpretation—and not with the theory of evolution.
Creation science is not accepted by most scientists, but this is claimed to be due partly to the religious views of the scientists, rather than scientific evidences[Citation Needed]. A poll among United States scientists showed approximately 45% of scientists believed there was no God.[1] In addition, a survey found that 93% of the scientists who were members of the United States National Academy of Sciences do not believe there is a God. [2]
