Difference between revisions of "Talk:Naturalistic evolution"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(...that's it?)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Unguided_evolution&oldid=93918 This] is the article that got deleted from Wikipedia? Please tell me that was just a figure of speech or something. If that's really the entire thing, I think I know why it got vaped - and no, it's not "because of The Liberals". --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 19:41, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
 
[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Unguided_evolution&oldid=93918 This] is the article that got deleted from Wikipedia? Please tell me that was just a figure of speech or something. If that's really the entire thing, I think I know why it got vaped - and no, it's not "because of The Liberals". --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 19:41, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
Perhaps it was not because of content, but because it is an unsourced stub, and appears to be an irrelevant statement of opinion better covered elsewhere.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 19:42, 8 April 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 23:42, April 8, 2007

How does one tell when evolution is guided, and when it is unguided? Teresita 19:37, 8 April 2007 (EDT)

It is untestable and unanswerable, unless you ask Phil.--PalMDtalk 19:38, 8 April 2007 (EDT)

...that's it?

This is the article that got deleted from Wikipedia? Please tell me that was just a figure of speech or something. If that's really the entire thing, I think I know why it got vaped - and no, it's not "because of The Liberals". --Sid 3050 19:41, 8 April 2007 (EDT)

Perhaps it was not because of content, but because it is an unsourced stub, and appears to be an irrelevant statement of opinion better covered elsewhere.--PalMDtalk 19:42, 8 April 2007 (EDT)