Difference between revisions of "User talk:Sacampbe"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Before you attempt to change the I.D. articles, before you try to claim evolution is a fact, I want you first to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that God does not exist. ~~~~") |
(Question about Conservapedia policy) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Before you attempt to change the I.D. articles, before you try to claim evolution is a fact, I want you first to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that God does not exist. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 12:47, 13 January 2012 (EST) | Before you attempt to change the I.D. articles, before you try to claim evolution is a fact, I want you first to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that God does not exist. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 12:47, 13 January 2012 (EST) | ||
| + | :In that case, shouldn't anyone who claims I.D. as a fact have to first prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that God ''does'' exist? After all, everything on Conservapedia must be '''"true and verifiable."''' If not, why is an exception made in that case of I.D.? --[[User:ColeN|ColeN]] 18:22, 13 January 2012 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 23:22, January 13, 2012
Before you attempt to change the I.D. articles, before you try to claim evolution is a fact, I want you first to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that God does not exist. Karajou 12:47, 13 January 2012 (EST)
- In that case, shouldn't anyone who claims I.D. as a fact have to first prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that God does exist? After all, everything on Conservapedia must be "true and verifiable." If not, why is an exception made in that case of I.D.? --ColeN 18:22, 13 January 2012 (EST)