Difference between revisions of "Evolution and science"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Evolution and science''' conflict with each other. [[Evolution]] is clearly [[atheism|atheistic]],<ref>http://www.atheists.org/flash.line/atheism1.htm</ref> [[liberal]] pseudo or [[junk science]] which is easily disproven by the numerous [[Counterexamples to Evolution|counterexamples to evolution]] that exist. Evolution is also unscientific because it is based on a [[Counterexamples to an Old Earth|time frame]] which predates [[creation]], and creation "science".
+
'''Evolution and science''' conflict with each other. [[Evolution]] is clearly [[atheism|atheistic]], [[liberal]] pseudo or [[junk science]] which is easily disproven by the numerous [[Counterexamples to Evolution|counterexamples to evolution]] that exist. Evolution is also unscientific because it is based on a [[Counterexamples to an Old Earth|time frame]] which predates [[creation]], and creation "science".
  
Intelligent people who can distinguish real [[science]] from atheistic secular junk science are incresingly embracing the rigid "[[logic]]" of [[creation "science"]].
+
Intelligent people who can distinguish real [[science]] from atheistic secular junk science are incresingly embracing the rigid "[[logic]]" of creation "science".

Revision as of 16:52, February 13, 2012

Evolution and science conflict with each other. Evolution is clearly atheistic, liberal pseudo or junk science which is easily disproven by the numerous counterexamples to evolution that exist. Evolution is also unscientific because it is based on a time frame which predates creation, and creation "science".

Intelligent people who can distinguish real science from atheistic secular junk science are incresingly embracing the rigid "logic" of creation "science".