Difference between revisions of "Evolution and science"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by Stevo (talk) to last revision by AmandaBunting) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Evolution and science''' conflict with each other. [[Evolution]] is clearly [[atheism|atheistic]], [[liberal]] pseudo or [[junk science]] which is easily disproven by the numerous [[Counterexamples to Evolution|counterexamples to evolution]] that exist. Evolution is also unscientific because it is based on a [[Counterexamples to an Old Earth|time frame]] which predates [[creation]] | + | '''Evolution and science''' conflict with each other. [[Evolution]] is clearly [[atheism|atheistic]],<ref>http://www.atheists.org/flash.line/atheism1.htm</ref> [[liberal]] pseudo or [[junk science]] which is easily disproven by the numerous [[Counterexamples to Evolution|counterexamples to evolution]] that exist. Evolution is also unscientific because it is based on a [[Counterexamples to an Old Earth|time frame]] which predates [[creation]]. |
| − | Intelligent people who can distinguish real [[science]] from atheistic secular junk science are incresingly embracing the rigid | + | Intelligent people who can distinguish real [[science]] from atheistic secular junk science are incresingly embracing the rigid [[logic]] of [[creation science]]. |
| + | |||
| + | ==References== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <references/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Science]] | ||
| + | [[Category: Evolution]] | ||
Revision as of 17:30, February 13, 2012
Evolution and science conflict with each other. Evolution is clearly atheistic,[1] liberal pseudo or junk science which is easily disproven by the numerous counterexamples to evolution that exist. Evolution is also unscientific because it is based on a time frame which predates creation.
Intelligent people who can distinguish real science from atheistic secular junk science are incresingly embracing the rigid logic of creation science.