Changes

569 bytes added ,  20:28, March 4, 2012
Line 19: Line 19:  
:Wasn't fighting a war and did nothing untrustworthy. I do not appreciate either accusation. The reality is that he is legally married under the law and so that is what he is. I guess "partner" would be the alternative. I'm more than ok with that. I can't say I'm thrilled with some of the changes made. Most notably the actual name is the "It Gets Better Project." That should be the title of the article. Your opinion on whether it is a project or not does not override the reality of its name. And the lead has lost its encyclopedic intro which was the main point of my rewrite and instead reads like an about section. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 15:19, 4 March 2012 (EST)
 
:Wasn't fighting a war and did nothing untrustworthy. I do not appreciate either accusation. The reality is that he is legally married under the law and so that is what he is. I guess "partner" would be the alternative. I'm more than ok with that. I can't say I'm thrilled with some of the changes made. Most notably the actual name is the "It Gets Better Project." That should be the title of the article. Your opinion on whether it is a project or not does not override the reality of its name. And the lead has lost its encyclopedic intro which was the main point of my rewrite and instead reads like an about section. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 15:19, 4 March 2012 (EST)
 
::"Ayzmo", the article will not be rewritten to fit your liberal, pro-gay perspective. These changes reflect the POV and manual of style of Conservapedia. Please respect that. If you cannot, there are many, many other articles to work on. The [[dog]] article, perhaps?--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 15:23, 4 March 2012 (EST)
 
::"Ayzmo", the article will not be rewritten to fit your liberal, pro-gay perspective. These changes reflect the POV and manual of style of Conservapedia. Please respect that. If you cannot, there are many, many other articles to work on. The [[dog]] article, perhaps?--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 15:23, 4 March 2012 (EST)
 +
 +
:::I tried to write the article from a neutral perspective as much as possible. As such I tried not to touch the criticisms that were there. The Title of the project is not a matter of contention anywhere as far as I'm concerned. And I'm not sure you'll want to now fix the spelling mistakes and broken sentences you have just reverted to. I'm sorry I improved an article which was by any standards pretty uninformative. I will however ask Andy about the Title since we should be getting that correct if nothing else. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 15:28, 4 March 2012 (EST)
SkipCaptcha
259

edits