Changes

:Jackmondoo, you seem frustrated that Darwinism hasn't gained far better traction in the world in terms of public acceptance - despite having 150 plus years to do so.  Given that [[global atheism]] is shrinking and is expected to shrink at an accelerated rate, the explosive growth of [[global Christianity]] and the inability of Darwinists such as yourself to satisfactorily answer the [http://creation.com/15-questions 15 questions for evolutionists] things are not going to go better for Darwinism in terms of public acceptance and likely to grow much worse. In addition, are you an atheist? If so, do you have any proof and evidence that atheism is true? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:47, 18 March 2012 (EDT)

:Jackmondoo, you seem frustrated that Darwinism hasn't gained far better traction in the world in terms of public acceptance - despite having 150 plus years to do so.  Given that [[global atheism]] is shrinking and is expected to shrink at an accelerated rate, the explosive growth of [[global Christianity]] and the inability of Darwinists such as yourself to satisfactorily answer the [http://creation.com/15-questions 15 questions for evolutionists] things are not going to go better for Darwinism in terms of public acceptance and likely to grow much worse. In addition, are you an atheist? If so, do you have any proof and evidence that atheism is true? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:47, 18 March 2012 (EDT)

::By the way, the [[Journal of Creation]] and the [[Creation Research Society Quarterly Journal]] are both peer reviewed journals. You failure to mention them despite them being listed at this website is indicative of you engaging in sloppy due diligence or deceit (see: [[Atheism and deception]]). Also, last time I checked the bulk of academia failed to predict the 2008 global economic crises, yet you want the public to take their evolutionism which supposedly happened millions of years ago as gospel truth - it is not going to happen (especially in the light of the fact that evolutionists cannot satisfactorily answer the [http://creation.com/15-questions 15 questions for evolutionists]). Lastly, given that Darwinists do not believe in open science and engage in [http://usstore.creation.com/catalog/slaughter-dissidents-p-963.html?osCsid=de3u859284nnchqbskrigeuaf4 repressive tactics] and have [http://creation.com/that-quote-about-the-missing-transitional-fossils "trade secrets"] they keep from the public, I find your 98% figure rather amusing. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 18:00, 18 March 2012 (EDT)

::By the way, the [[Journal of Creation]] and the [[Creation Research Society Quarterly Journal]] are both peer reviewed journals. You failure to mention them despite them being listed at this website is indicative of you engaging in sloppy due diligence or deceit (see: [[Atheism and deception]]). Also, last time I checked the bulk of academia failed to predict the 2008 global economic crises, yet you want the public to take their evolutionism which supposedly happened millions of years ago as gospel truth - it is not going to happen (especially in the light of the fact that evolutionists cannot satisfactorily answer the [http://creation.com/15-questions 15 questions for evolutionists]). Lastly, given that Darwinists do not believe in open science and engage in [http://usstore.creation.com/catalog/slaughter-dissidents-p-963.html?osCsid=de3u859284nnchqbskrigeuaf4 repressive tactics] and have [http://creation.com/that-quote-about-the-missing-transitional-fossils "trade secrets"] they keep from the public, I find your 98% figure rather amusing. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 18:00, 18 March 2012 (EDT)