Changes

:::Probably the best refutation at present is with artificial satellites, since their orbital period is so short.  If you want to argue for the Newcomb-Hall theory, your best bet would be to find data showing that the periapsis of the International Space Station precesses by .013 degrees per month.  That is an enormous precession, easily observed.  The orbital eccentricity is only .001, but, since the ISS is so close and is in constant contact by radio and radar, there should be extremely good data.  You should probably contact the author of the [http://www.heavens-above.com/ Heavens Above] web site.  It has a huge amount of information on things like this.

:::Probably the best refutation at present is with artificial satellites, since their orbital period is so short.  If you want to argue for the Newcomb-Hall theory, your best bet would be to find data showing that the periapsis of the International Space Station precesses by .013 degrees per month.  That is an enormous precession, easily observed.  The orbital eccentricity is only .001, but, since the ISS is so close and is in constant contact by radio and radar, there should be extremely good data.  You should probably contact the author of the [http://www.heavens-above.com/ Heavens Above] web site.  It has a huge amount of information on things like this.

:::I think that you will find is that what you are up against is not liberals, but facts.  [[User:JudyJ|JudyJ]] 12:44, 13 May 2012 (EDT)

:::I think that you will find that what you are up against is not liberals, but facts.  [[User:JudyJ|JudyJ]] 12:44, 13 May 2012 (EDT)

== First sentence of article contradicted by the rest ==

== First sentence of article contradicted by the rest ==