Difference between revisions of "Talk:Question evolution! campaign"
Conservative (Talk | contribs) |
FrostedFlame (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
It is so good to be a Bible believing creationist! It is so easy to crush the pseudoscience of [[evolution]]ism. It merely takes getting the anti-evolution message out there.[http://creation.com/creation-timely-tool-for-todays-evangelist][http://creation.com/taking-creation-evangelism-to-the-streets] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 07:34, 2 June 2012 (EDT) | It is so good to be a Bible believing creationist! It is so easy to crush the pseudoscience of [[evolution]]ism. It merely takes getting the anti-evolution message out there.[http://creation.com/creation-timely-tool-for-todays-evangelist][http://creation.com/taking-creation-evangelism-to-the-streets] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 07:34, 2 June 2012 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==15 Questions Answered?== | ||
| + | Been trying to link it but the "spam filters" have been blocking the site and my attempts to circumvent (gosh that sounds so nefarious but essentially what i was doing, not going to lie) the black list with Tiny Url. But anyways, unless i missed something, nothing is mentioned about the 15 questions being answered (to a satisfactory degree is up for some healthy spirited debate!). I know this site is at odds with RatyonalWyky so i suppose on some level I can understand why it's blacklisted but anyways anyone who wants to check it out swing by Ratyonalwyky and look up "Question Evolution" and see the answers put forth. I thought about just posting the answers directly here but it takes up too much space as these aren't answers with a sentence or two or three but detailed responses to the questions put forth. Be nice to see hopefully an intelligent response to what's already put forth. | ||
| + | |||
| + | edit* you've got to be kidding me! I can understand blocking URL's from sites at odds with this site, but once again YOU'VE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME! I can't even mention those sites in any context! Oh well, run your site how you want to, Andrew. You've done well to distinguish yourself from Wikipedia | ||
Revision as of 23:17, June 17, 2012
Like the campaign!
I like how this is turning out; stumping evolutionists/atheists with fifteen questions based on facts and logic, while helping people to see the truth written in Genesis. Karajou 19:22, 21 May 2012 (EDT)
Question Evolution! Campaign is achieving its goal - people are questioning evolution!
American young earth creationism increased in the last two years - Gallup survey. Question evolution! campaign and other efforts of creationists are working!.[1]
It is so good to be a Bible believing creationist! It is so easy to crush the pseudoscience of evolutionism. It merely takes getting the anti-evolution message out there.[2][3] Conservative 07:34, 2 June 2012 (EDT)
15 Questions Answered?
Been trying to link it but the "spam filters" have been blocking the site and my attempts to circumvent (gosh that sounds so nefarious but essentially what i was doing, not going to lie) the black list with Tiny Url. But anyways, unless i missed something, nothing is mentioned about the 15 questions being answered (to a satisfactory degree is up for some healthy spirited debate!). I know this site is at odds with RatyonalWyky so i suppose on some level I can understand why it's blacklisted but anyways anyone who wants to check it out swing by Ratyonalwyky and look up "Question Evolution" and see the answers put forth. I thought about just posting the answers directly here but it takes up too much space as these aren't answers with a sentence or two or three but detailed responses to the questions put forth. Be nice to see hopefully an intelligent response to what's already put forth.
edit* you've got to be kidding me! I can understand blocking URL's from sites at odds with this site, but once again YOU'VE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME! I can't even mention those sites in any context! Oh well, run your site how you want to, Andrew. You've done well to distinguish yourself from Wikipedia
