SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
1,134
edits
Changes
User:JZambrano/WhyILeftWikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 23:06, July 27, 2012
, 23:06, July 27, 2012adding archive sources
* 2 - The [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AFrank&action=history&year=2009&month=12&tagfilter= December 2009 page history for Frank's Talk Page]
* 2 - The [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AFrank&action=history&year=2009&month=12&tagfilter= December 2009 page history for Frank's Talk Page]
* 3 - The [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGrsz11&action=history&year=2009&month=12&tagfilter= December 2009 page history for Grsz's Talk Page]
* 3 - The [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGrsz11&action=history&year=2009&month=12&tagfilter= December 2009 page history for Grsz's Talk Page]
The conversations can be seen in full, though they were closed/collapsed in hab tags to prevent their being easily seen by the biased editors, here. Admin Frank archived them in multiple areas to prevent their being easily viewed.
* Talk Barack Obama Archives [Talk:Barack_Obama/Archive_65 65], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Barack_Obama/Archive_66 66], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Barack_Obama/Archive_67 67], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Barack_Obama/Archive_68 68], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Barack_Obama/Archive_69 69], and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Barack_Obama/Archive_70 70].
I am confident these sources clearly show the level of liberal bias to be seen on Wikipedia, in preventing mention of even a major controversy surrounding Obama like his opposition to medical care for newborn children fully outside the womb -- his opposition to the famously popular Born Alive Infants Protection Act in 2002 that became U.S. Law with public approval upwards of 90% which passed the U.S. Senate unanimously. Despite the considerable news coverage of the subject in both 2004 and 2008, Wikipedia as an institution refused to give so much as a one-sentence mention to the subject, betraying all its hypocritical claims of impartiality and objectivity.
I am confident these sources clearly show the level of liberal bias to be seen on Wikipedia, in preventing mention of even a major controversy surrounding Obama like his opposition to medical care for newborn children fully outside the womb -- his opposition to the famously popular Born Alive Infants Protection Act in 2002 that became U.S. Law with public approval upwards of 90% which passed the U.S. Senate unanimously. Despite the considerable news coverage of the subject in both 2004 and 2008, Wikipedia as an institution refused to give so much as a one-sentence mention to the subject, betraying all its hypocritical claims of impartiality and objectivity.