It's supposed to be an encyclopedia. The main problem with the main page content is that it's a collection of fringe opinion where it is not blatantly false. An encyclopedia should at the very least attempt to publish only established facts and defensible opinion. --[[User:TonySidaway|TonySidaway]] 22:37, 6 May 2013 (EDT) | It's supposed to be an encyclopedia. The main problem with the main page content is that it's a collection of fringe opinion where it is not blatantly false. An encyclopedia should at the very least attempt to publish only established facts and defensible opinion. --[[User:TonySidaway|TonySidaway]] 22:37, 6 May 2013 (EDT) |