37
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8:
Line 8: − What evidence?+
Debate:If the Bible didn't contain a creation story, would anyone even consider the idea of a young earth? (view source)
Revision as of 20:37, April 14, 2007
, 20:37, April 14, 2007→YES!
Young earth is a fact that is validated by an unbiased and accurate assesment of the evidence. The bible may have provided the clues but it stands on its own.[[User:Rebiu|Rebiu]] 14:44, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
Young earth is a fact that is validated by an unbiased and accurate assesment of the evidence. The bible may have provided the clues but it stands on its own.[[User:Rebiu|Rebiu]] 14:44, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
No, it's not. If it were, then it would be the scientific consensus regarding the interpretation of the evidence. It isn't, purely for the reason that that is not what the evidence indicates. [[[[User:AdamNelson|AdamNelson]] 16:37, 14 April 2007 (EDT)User:AdamNelson|AdamNelson]]
==No!==
==No!==