555
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 34:
Line 34: + + +
Debate:Has anyone ever been been banned for pointing out that many of the other entries on this site are in need of citation and evidence to back up statements? (view source)
Revision as of 10:52, April 26, 2007
, 10:52, April 26, 2007→Yes: common practice
:It was fairly clear that [[User:WhatIsG0ing0n|WhatIsG0ing0n]] was blocked for questioning accuracy and verifiability. Of course some other excuse was given. I couldn't find it in the rules though. I was threatened with the 90/10 [[rule]] for inquiring about it. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&diff=127442&oldid=127424]
:It was fairly clear that [[User:WhatIsG0ing0n|WhatIsG0ing0n]] was blocked for questioning accuracy and verifiability. Of course some other excuse was given. I couldn't find it in the rules though. I was threatened with the 90/10 [[rule]] for inquiring about it. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&diff=127442&oldid=127424]
:[[User:Auld Nick|Auld Nick]] 17:14, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
:[[User:Auld Nick|Auld Nick]] 17:14, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
::It seems to be a common practice among some sysops, see [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGeo.plrd&diff=122364&oldid=122360 here].
::[[User:Auld Nick|Auld Nick]] 06:52, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
==No==
==No==