I really think this response edit must for the sake of truth be included on the Debate page, right after RobSmith's quote of 1 Timothy 5:18a (his leaving out of v 15b), which he applies to himself in refusing to answer if he is an accredited ordained "preacher of the gospel". Given his past performance up to this day, I believe he will oppose including it, as an embarrassment to him for making false claims about himself. He has a right to '''[[Witnessing|witness]]''' to the gospel according to his own understanding, but no right to claim to be a "'''preacher of the gospel'''" if he hasn't been acknowledged by any church as "appointed and ordained" a preacher. | I really think this response edit must for the sake of truth be included on the Debate page, right after RobSmith's quote of 1 Timothy 5:18a (his leaving out of v 15b), which he applies to himself in refusing to answer if he is an accredited ordained "preacher of the gospel". Given his past performance up to this day, I believe he will oppose including it, as an embarrassment to him for making false claims about himself. He has a right to '''[[Witnessing|witness]]''' to the gospel according to his own understanding, but no right to claim to be a "'''preacher of the gospel'''" if he hasn't been acknowledged by any church as "appointed and ordained" a preacher. |