Changes

:I realize nothing is true for you in your simpleton mindset until you read about it in the [[fake news]] media. But the quality of your education really isn't the subject of this essay. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]^{[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]} 13:35, October 24, 2023 (EDT)

:I realize nothing is true for you in your simpleton mindset until you read about it in the [[fake news]] media. But the quality of your education really isn't the subject of this essay. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]^{[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]} 13:35, October 24, 2023 (EDT)

== Concerning your lame stupidity charge concerning me ==

== Concerning your lame stupidity charge concerning me ==

Furthermore, based on my college entrance scores and [http://www.assessmentpsychology.com/iq.htm a table that correlates college entrance exams with a person's IQ and other data], I estimate my IQ is in the top 5% of people.

Furthermore, based on my college entrance scores and [http://www.assessmentpsychology.com/iq.htm a table that correlates college entrance exams with a person's IQ and other data], I estimate my IQ is in the top 5% of people.

In addition, high IQ people accept logical conclusions, but you constantly use logical fallacies. Also, people who do not have a very high IQ frequently engage in either/or thinking and partisan thinking. High IQ people are more inclined towards probabilistic thinking and balancing between seemingly paradoxical possibilities and integrating various views when possible. You on the other hand engage in Russia/China cheerleading.  In addition, people who don't have very high IQs often attempt to rationalize their errors. People with very high IQs see no point in hesitating to admit them. Your protracted attempt to admit your error in the [[Bill Browder]] article which are documented in the article's talk page, clearly shows that are extremely resistant to admit errors. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:02, October 24, 2023 (EDT)

In addition, high IQ people accept logical conclusions, but you constantly use logical fallacies. Also, people who do not have a very high IQ frequently engage in either/or thinking and partisan thinking. High IQ people are more inclined towards probabilistic thinking and balancing between seemingly paradoxical possibilities and integrating various views when possible. You on the other hand engage in Russia/China cheerleading.  In addition, people who don't have very high IQs often attempt to rationalize their errors. People with very high IQs see no point in hesitating to admit them. Your protracted failure to admit your error in the [[Bill Browder]] article which is documented in the article's talk page, clearly shows that are extremely resistant to admit errors. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:02, October 24, 2023 (EDT)

:Stop trolling and acting like such a simpleton. 18:04, October 24, 2023 (EDT)

:Stop trolling and acting like such a simpleton. 18:04, October 24, 2023 (EDT)