| Line 137: |
Line 137: |
| | | | |
| | We can go into the case of [[Michelle Bachmann]] and [[tariff]]s next, whom Andy supported, if you so desire. Better yet, back off, leave me alone, and quit contaminating [[Conservapedia]] on contemporary [[geopolitical]] and [[macroeconomic]] subjects that you have ABSOLUTELY no interest and understaffing of, solely motivated by a malicious vendetta toward me. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]</sup> 07:45, January 28, 2025 (EST) | | We can go into the case of [[Michelle Bachmann]] and [[tariff]]s next, whom Andy supported, if you so desire. Better yet, back off, leave me alone, and quit contaminating [[Conservapedia]] on contemporary [[geopolitical]] and [[macroeconomic]] subjects that you have ABSOLUTELY no interest and understaffing of, solely motivated by a malicious vendetta toward me. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]</sup> 07:45, January 28, 2025 (EST) |
| − | :You are telling me to back off, but you are the one who is continually posting on the talk pages of my essays because you crave my attention and are obsessed with me.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :And you have called some Conservapedians dummies and continually call me stupid which is a sign of having an IQ below 115 as it a sign of narcissistic rivalry. And given your closed-mindedness (that endeavors to tell me what news sources not to read); arrogance (lack of intellectual humility); accusing people of things you constantly do which other Conservapedians have commented on (which shows a lack of introspection/self-awareness); lack of social skills that causes [[Team CP]] to only have you as a member; your all-or-nothing thinking; frequent use of logical fallacies; poor listening ability on the phone; narrow personal interest of being obsessed with Russia (a nation with the second highest alcoholism rate in the world, low church attendance and an AIDS epidemic among other things); quickness to become angry; you falling for Chinese/Russian propaganda, etc. etc. etc., your IQ may be below 100. And these unintelligent behaviors of yours are fixable or at least they can be mitigated, but you have no interest in fixing them. You continue to stay in these mental ruts.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :Instead of continually calling me stupid (And indicating that another prominent Conservapedian is a dummy) and engaging in other unintelligent behaviors, I would suggest reading more books as it may increase your mental acuity and knowledge. In addition, reading books would remind you that there are many things that you do not know so you may finally develop some intellectual humility. If you did read more books instead of engaging in hostile, anti-social behaviors, maybe User: Karajou would stop calling you a knucklehead. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:43, January 28, 2025 (EST)
| |
| − | ::By the way, I gave you two essays of Phyllis Schlafly indicating that she was for tariffs and not against them.[https://www.phyllisschlafly.com/national-sovereignty/trade/the-phyllis-schlafly-report-march-1996/][https://www.phyllisschlafly.com/national-sovereignty/what-s-the-big-deal-about-tariffs-1392/] Just because she supported some of Ronald Reagan's public policies, doesn't mean she supported all his policies. This is a sign of your all-or-nothing thinking and your resistance to facts (lack of intellectual curiosity and resistance to changing your opinion) which are unintelligent behaviors. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:55, January 28, 2025 (EST)
| |
| − | :::Also, just stating your opinions doesn't make them facts. How many times do I have to tell you that? So telling me that tariffs caused the Great Depression is totally unimpressive - especially since you made no mention of the 1929 stock market crash in the USA. And anything done in excess and not done intelligently can cause economic problems so even if the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act did make the Great Depression worse, that doesn't necessarily mean that all tariffs are bad because not all nations engage in fair trade, etc. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:59, January 28, 2025 (EST)
| |
| − | ::::You continually exalt yourself and say that I am not in your league when it comes to world affairs/politics and macroeconomics. This is classic superiority complex behavior.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::::I predicted that Russia could not have a [[Guns and butter economic concept|guns and butter economy]] without inflation hitting it down the pike. You told me that this was not going to happen. Well, you were wrong. In addition, I was right about China's economy getting worse and you were wrong. I am certainly not in your league on foreign policy and macroeconomics because you are in the bush league. Looking back, I am glad that I had a very strict and tough macroeconomics professor. I still remember something he said in relation to economics: "There is no such thing as a free lunch". [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:04, January 28, 2025 (EST)
| |