Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,874
edits
Changes
Talk:Essay: Russian oil: Lower future production/profits due to future higher extraction costs and other inefficiencies (view source)
Revision as of 02:19, February 21, 2025
, 02:19, February 21, 2025→P.S. Feel free to contact me in 2040
::::::Oh, you don't see how [[Greenland]] is a negotiating tactic for a Yalta 2.0 Conference? Russia gets to keep Donbass, Crimea, Odessa, Kharkov, and Dnepropetrovsk, China gets Taiwan back, and America gets Greenland and the Canal Zone. And they all lived happily ever after. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|I don’t really care, Margaret]]</sup> 21:06, February 20, 2025 (EST)
::::::Oh, you don't see how [[Greenland]] is a negotiating tactic for a Yalta 2.0 Conference? Russia gets to keep Donbass, Crimea, Odessa, Kharkov, and Dnepropetrovsk, China gets Taiwan back, and America gets Greenland and the Canal Zone. And they all lived happily ever after. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|I don’t really care, Margaret]]</sup> 21:06, February 20, 2025 (EST)
I disagree. Trump's victory in 2024, which was bigger than his 2016 victory, caused his ego to get bigger which helped cause the Greenland/Canada remarks. They weren't helpful. Liberal Canadians may decide to buy less USA products for a while. And as far as Greenland, Denmark subsidizes it and the USA has a military base in Greenland. A more diplomatic approach to Denmark regarding Greenland would have been more effective. The chance of the USA buying Greenland when it has a high national debt is very remote. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:16, February 20, 2025 (EST)
I disagree. Trump's victory in 2024, which was bigger than his 2016 victory, caused his ego to get bigger which helped cause the Greenland/Canada remarks. They weren't helpful. Liberal Canadians may decide to buy less USA products for a while. And as far as Greenland, Denmark subsidizes it and the USA has a military base in Greenland. A more diplomatic approach to Denmark regarding Greenland would have been more effective as far as mining, military considerations, the Artic Sea, etc. The chance of the USA buying Greenland when it has a high national debt is very remote. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:16, February 20, 2025 (EST)