Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,636
edits
Changes
Talk:Essay: Russian oil: Lower future production/profits due to future higher extraction costs and other inefficiencies (view source)
Revision as of 19:36, February 21, 2025
, 19:36, February 21, 2025→P.S. Feel free to contact me in 2040
::::You're [[spamming]] again. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|I don’t really care, Margaret]]</sup> 20:40, February 20, 2025 (EST)
::::You're [[spamming]] again. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|I don’t really care, Margaret]]</sup> 20:40, February 20, 2025 (EST)
:::::I am taking a break from the news for a season. I will be focusing on other things such as helping Christendom go from one glorious victory to another! Trump is off to a good start, but I think his Greenland rhetoric was overblown and so was his Canada being the 51st state rhetoric ([https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/article/new-poll-says-27-of-canadians-view-the-united-states-as-an-enemy-country/ New poll says 27% of Canadians view the United States as an 'enemy' country]). Hopefully, Trump improves Russia-USA relations given they have some shared interests (No nuclear war, reduction in Islamic terrorism, etc.). And I suspect USA-Canadian relations will improve once Canada has a more conservative leader. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:59, February 20, 2025 (EST)
:::::I am taking a break from the news for a season. I will be focusing on other things such as helping Christendom go from one glorious victory to another! Trump is off to a good start, but I think his Greenland rhetoric was overblown and so was his Canada being the 51st state rhetoric ([https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/article/new-poll-says-27-of-canadians-view-the-united-states-as-an-enemy-country/ New poll says 27% of Canadians view the United States as an 'enemy' country]). Hopefully, Trump improves Russia-USA relations given they have some shared interests (No nuclear war, reduction in Islamic terrorism, etc.). And I suspect USA-Canadian relations will improve once Canada has a more conservative leader. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:59, February 20, 2025 (EST)
[[File:Future of the free world.PNG|right|300px|thumb|The future of the free world. [https://youtu.be/IDRjughhXMg] ]]
::::::Oh, you don't see how [[Greenland]] is a negotiating tactic for a Yalta 2.0 Conference? Russia gets to keep Donbass, Crimea, Odessa, Kharkov, and Dnepropetrovsk, China gets Taiwan back, and America gets Greenland and the Canal Zone. And they all lived happily ever after. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|I don’t really care, Margaret]]</sup> 21:06, February 20, 2025 (EST)
::::::Oh, you don't see how [[Greenland]] is a negotiating tactic for a Yalta 2.0 Conference? Russia gets to keep Donbass, Crimea, Odessa, Kharkov, and Dnepropetrovsk, China gets Taiwan back, and America gets Greenland and the Canal Zone. And they all lived happily ever after. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|I don’t really care, Margaret]]</sup> 21:06, February 20, 2025 (EST)
:::::::I disagree. Trump's victory in 2024, which was bigger than his 2016 victory, caused his ego to get bigger which helped cause the Greenland/Canada remarks. They weren't helpful. Liberal Canadians may decide to buy less USA products for a while. And as far as Greenland, Denmark subsidizes it and the USA has a military base in Greenland. A more diplomatic approach to Denmark regarding Greenland would have been more effective as far as mining, military considerations, the Artic Sea, etc. The chance of the USA buying Greenland when it has a high national debt is very remote - especially since Denmark doesn't want to sell it and the USA doesn't want to invade it. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:16, February 20, 2025 (EST)
:::::::I disagree. Trump's victory in 2024, which was bigger than his 2016 victory, caused his ego to get bigger which helped cause the Greenland/Canada remarks. They weren't helpful. Liberal Canadians may decide to buy less USA products for a while. And as far as Greenland, Denmark subsidizes it and the USA has a military base in Greenland. A more diplomatic approach to Denmark regarding Greenland would have been more effective as far as mining, military considerations, the Artic Sea, etc. The chance of the USA buying Greenland when it has a high national debt is very remote - especially since Denmark doesn't want to sell it and the USA doesn't want to invade it. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:16, February 20, 2025 (EST)