Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,850
edits
Changes
Talk:Essay: Communist China’s quixotic quest to innovate: A statist economy can’t make creativity greatly blossom (view source)
Revision as of 08:13, September 29, 2025
, 08:13, September 29, 2025→Rebuttals
=== Rebuttals ===
=== Rebuttals ===
Questions:
'''Questions:'''
1. Do we live in a multidimensional world or a one-dimensional world where a country's manufacturing base and associated degree of robotization is the only factor?
1. Do we live in a multidimensional world or a one-dimensional world where a country's manufacturing base and associated degree of robotization is the only factor?
2. How is China's general economy? See: [[Essay: It's time to be very bearish about China's long-term economy]]
2. How is China's general economy? See: [[Essay: It's time to be very bearish about China's long-term economy]]
3. Is the USA reindustrializing?
3. Is the USA reindustrializing? If so, what are its prospects in this regard?
4. [https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_62435f0f-85e7-42a4-8d52-c5873b2699b4 How important are services when it comes to an economy escaping the middle-income trap?], 2025
5. Is it true that innovation in one sector of the economy, such as from the services sector, can cross-pollinate into other sectors of the economy? If not, why not?
6. Are economies that are well-diversified more resilient and do they have more opportunities for the aforementioned cross-pollination? If not, why not?
I trust this clarifies matters. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 04:03, September 29, 2025 (EDT)
I trust this clarifies matters. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 04:03, September 29, 2025 (EDT)