303
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 53:
Line 53: + +
Debate:Is infinite regression ever valid as a form of reasoning, or acceptable as a way the universe works, or came to be? (view source)
Revision as of 13:11, March 9, 2007
, 13:11, March 9, 2007no edit summary
Look, I am not going to continue responding to your cyclic arguments on this matter of gas thermodynamics any further in this forum, the literature is out there as to ''why'' the [[COBE]] and [[WMAP]] and other results confirm this is the ''first'' and ''only'' expansion of the universe that will ever happen--go satisfy any lingering questions you may have on your own. The subject at hand is Infinite Regression: Valid Reasoning or No? Now do you have any meaningful comments on this subject? --[[User:Knowthetruth|Knowthetruth]] 01:52, 9 March 2007 (EST)
Look, I am not going to continue responding to your cyclic arguments on this matter of gas thermodynamics any further in this forum, the literature is out there as to ''why'' the [[COBE]] and [[WMAP]] and other results confirm this is the ''first'' and ''only'' expansion of the universe that will ever happen--go satisfy any lingering questions you may have on your own. The subject at hand is Infinite Regression: Valid Reasoning or No? Now do you have any meaningful comments on this subject? --[[User:Knowthetruth|Knowthetruth]] 01:52, 9 March 2007 (EST)
:There is certainly no evidence that radiation is leaving the universe. [[User:Nematocyte|Nematocyte]] 08:11, 9 March 2007 (EST)