18
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 78:
Line 78: + +
Debate:Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools? (view source)
Revision as of 02:25, March 14, 2007
, 02:25, March 14, 2007→"Science" is irrelevant.
Creationism should be taught in schools because it is the Truth. Children should not be learning "theories" that are obviously falsifiable since all one needs to do is compare them with Biblical truth. --[[User:NVConservative|NVConservative]] 16:18, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
Creationism should be taught in schools because it is the Truth. Children should not be learning "theories" that are obviously falsifiable since all one needs to do is compare them with Biblical truth. --[[User:NVConservative|NVConservative]] 16:18, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
'''Reply:''' Simple question. How do you know the Bible is the Truth?
=== Science is neutral toward Creationism. ===
=== Science is neutral toward Creationism. ===