277
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 53:
Line 53: + +
Debate:Who feels that scientific related articles should only reference published research papers instead of websites when dealing with research instead of application? (view source)
Revision as of 17:16, December 20, 2007
, 17:16, December 20, 2007→No
:Good point but it seems the issue we are having is the substantiation of claims. The POV issue is the problem that we are finding on many of the pages here. By having the citations as accurate as the science it would reduce the POV and provide an objective stance to the reader. Right now many of the science based articles on this site could not be used by a student to pass any science exams since they are riddled with POV and quote mines without providing an accurate description of the science.--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 10:17, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
:Good point but it seems the issue we are having is the substantiation of claims. The POV issue is the problem that we are finding on many of the pages here. By having the citations as accurate as the science it would reduce the POV and provide an objective stance to the reader. Right now many of the science based articles on this site could not be used by a student to pass any science exams since they are riddled with POV and quote mines without providing an accurate description of the science.--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 10:17, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
::Also the problem of who publishes the research. Which religious POV published it? Evolutionism or Creation? Also scientific related? Or just pure physical science? Sounds more like this is a fishing expedition then a sound query. Well you can always set up enough rules and regulations on anything to get a desired affect.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 12:16, 20 December 2007 (EST)