Open main menu
Home
Random
Log in
Settings
About Conservapedia
Disclaimers
Conservapedia
Search
Changes
← Older edit
Newer edit →
Debate:Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools
(view source)
Revision as of 20:55, February 19, 2008
128 bytes added
,
20:55, February 19, 2008
no edit summary
Line 18:
Line 18:
== No, but it should be taught as a religious alternative to evolution ==
== No, but it should be taught as a religious alternative to evolution ==
−
+
No, a thousand times no. Science has a place in school, religion only has a place in church/the home. This is not science. Chris
[[category:conservapedia Debates]]
[[category:conservapedia Debates]]
L0tics
9
edits