55
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 19:
Line 19: − + +
Debate:Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools (view source)
Revision as of 01:20, September 24, 2009
, 01:20, September 24, 2009→No, but it should be taught as a religious alternative to evolution
== No, but it should be taught as a religious alternative to evolution ==
== No, but it should be taught as a religious alternative to evolution ==
ID is not Creation , and Science related to Creation is called [[Creation Science]],All subjects taught in school are not falsifiable. In my opinion Creation should be taught as a fact. In fact I believe the whole Bible should be taught as God's True inspired Word. However I do not foresee this happening, alas.
[[Baronvonbob]]
[[category:conservapedia Debates]]
[[category:conservapedia Debates]]