167
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 53:
Line 53: + Line 208:
Line 209: + + + + +
Debate:Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools? (view source)
Revision as of 00:55, April 5, 2007
, 00:55, April 5, 2007no edit summary
Does it really do any good if American children learn to dismiss natural science? Do we really want to fall behind Europe and the rest of the world?
Does it really do any good if American children learn to dismiss natural science? Do we really want to fall behind Europe and the rest of the world?
: '''REPLY'''
: '''REPLY'''
:::Using the math skills employed to determine the comparative liberalness of wikipedia, I can ascertain that there is a 33% chance that with any experiment, evolution can be disproven. As much as you say evolution is a religion, evolution is falsifiable and has predictive abilities. ID does not. [[User:Myk|Myk]] 13:29, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
:::Using the math skills employed to determine the comparative liberalness of wikipedia, I can ascertain that there is a 33% chance that with any experiment, evolution can be disproven. As much as you say evolution is a religion, evolution is falsifiable and has predictive abilities. ID does not. [[User:Myk|Myk]] 13:29, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
==Don't==
Don't teach creationism in school if you don't want to hear evolution in church :P [[User:AtheistKathryn|AtheistKathryn]] 20:55, 4 April 2007 (EDT)