Changes

434 bytes added ,  15:48, April 12, 2007
no one likes a smart aleck, but in this case an innocent man's life hangs in the balance
Line 1: Line 1:  
Two excellent movies about a jury in a murder trial. Initially, eleven jurors are ready to convict the defendant and are getting increasingly angry at the lone man who still has [[reasonable doubt]]. The movie follows the conversation of the jurors. Interestingly enough, the audience never finds out whether the defendant is guilty; this further stresses "innocence until proven guilty".
 
Two excellent movies about a jury in a murder trial. Initially, eleven jurors are ready to convict the defendant and are getting increasingly angry at the lone man who still has [[reasonable doubt]]. The movie follows the conversation of the jurors. Interestingly enough, the audience never finds out whether the defendant is guilty; this further stresses "innocence until proven guilty".
 +
 +
The movie illustrates three particulars of [[justice]] unique to American democracy:
 +
#the defendant does not have to demonstrate his innocence. He is innocent until proved guilty. #the verdict must be unanimous, since unanimity guards against a miscarriage of justice.
 +
#the defendant can be convicted only in the absence of reasonable doubt on the part of the jury. [http://www.bookrags.com/studyguide-twelve-angry-men/themes.html]
    
==External links==
 
==External links==
    
*[http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0050083/quotes Extensive quotes from the movie] showing how Juror #8 ([[Henry Fonda]]) establishes reasonable doubt in the minds of the other jury members.
 
*[http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0050083/quotes Extensive quotes from the movie] showing how Juror #8 ([[Henry Fonda]]) establishes reasonable doubt in the minds of the other jury members.
Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650

edits