37
edits
Changes
→What's wrong with a Euro-centric Point of View?: new section
: I agree that the reference to JPEGs is not necessary. As for the second point, it's clear that TerryH ''has'' deleted something (presumably an IP address), although I don't understand how it came to be there. The "log in" link shows that he was not logged in, but when I look at the site, in both IE and Firefox, both on Windows, no IP shows up there. So I don't know why it did for TerryH. Given that it did, however, I don't have a problem with that particular disclaimer point. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:16, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
: I agree that the reference to JPEGs is not necessary. As for the second point, it's clear that TerryH ''has'' deleted something (presumably an IP address), although I don't understand how it came to be there. The "log in" link shows that he was not logged in, but when I look at the site, in both IE and Firefox, both on Windows, no IP shows up there. So I don't know why it did for TerryH. Given that it did, however, I don't have a problem with that particular disclaimer point. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:16, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
::Oh, ''now'' I see it. I can explain that one, actually. The IP shows up only under certain conditions: Go to the site (or any other wiki you're not logged in to, from what I know) and click on the "Log in" link (or any link that leads to the "Login required to edit" screen, such as a redlink). From that moment on, until you close the tab/window, the IP will be displayed there. As long as you're a nice lurker and never try to log in or hit redlinks, you won't see your IP up there. --[[User:DirkB|DirkB]] 23:29, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
::Oh, ''now'' I see it. I can explain that one, actually. The IP shows up only under certain conditions: Go to the site (or any other wiki you're not logged in to, from what I know) and click on the "Log in" link (or any link that leads to the "Login required to edit" screen, such as a redlink). From that moment on, until you close the tab/window, the IP will be displayed there. As long as you're a nice lurker and never try to log in or hit redlinks, you won't see your IP up there. --[[User:DirkB|DirkB]] 23:29, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
== What's wrong with a Euro-centric Point of View? ==
What the hell is wrong with a Euro-centric point of view?
The Europeans brought culture, intelligence, enlightenment, freedom, created the modern world that we live in today, and that is somehow conducive of a racist point of view, even though that IS how pretty much history happened!
That is not racism! Euro-centric point of view is not a bad one to have, especially considering that the Muslim immigrants are subverting that point of view over in Europe and being of a viewpoint of preserving original European culture makes you a "racist?" I think not because the real racists are the white guilt people that hate everything GOOD that our founders gave to the rest of the uncivilized world in the rest of the world and gave the world enlightenment, progress, and real humanity. Is this really "racism?" You fail to mention anything about the white ARYAN viewpoint of Metapedia and use the liberal terminology of "Euro-centric" point of view of preserving your culture as being "racism" when in fact, they are about preserving WHITE ARYAN RACIAL PURITY! Please do not use far-left biased terminology.
And NO I am NOT a White Supremacist racist bigot! I am just stating facts! I do not self-hating garbage that lumps in people who think that European culture is really great and really benefited humanity and its progress over the last few centuries as being a sign of being like these Nazi bastards (Am I allowed to use bad language here?) on Metapedia.
Please get your facts straight.