183
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 77:
Line 77: + + + + + + − * Silliness and other problems should be warned for. − * Sysops and Bureaucrats are the Administrators of Conservapedia. Their instructions, as to Conservapedia policy and/or the appropriateness or inappropriateness of user actions, are to be followed.
Conservapedia talk:Administrators (view source)
Revision as of 07:46, April 13, 2007
, 07:46, April 13, 2007no edit summary
I find the Duties & Authority section pretty hard to read (why is it a bullet list with just one bullet for the whole paragraph?). I'm reluctant to change the formatting without prior approval, so instead I'm posting the proposed formatting here. I do not believe I've made any semantic changes (if I haven't captured the intended meaning, it could be seen as evidence that the current paragraph is hard to understand). --[[User:Jtl|Jtl]] 03:42, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
I find the Duties & Authority section pretty hard to read (why is it a bullet list with just one bullet for the whole paragraph?). I'm reluctant to change the formatting without prior approval, so instead I'm posting the proposed formatting here. I do not believe I've made any semantic changes (if I haven't captured the intended meaning, it could be seen as evidence that the current paragraph is hard to understand). --[[User:Jtl|Jtl]] 03:42, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
Sysops and Bureaucrats are the Administrators of Conservapedia. Their instructions, as to Conservapedia policy and/or the appropriateness or inappropriateness of user actions, are to be followed.
Non-blockable:
* Unlike Wikipedia, we do not block for ideological reasons. In rare cases, our approach to repeated ideological conflict is to lock the page, and then allow the group of Sysops to make changes on a manual basis based upon suggestions on the Talk page.
* Unlike Wikipedia, we do not block for ideological reasons. In rare cases, our approach to repeated ideological conflict is to lock the page, and then allow the group of Sysops to make changes on a manual basis based upon suggestions on the Talk page.
* Silliness and other problems should be warned for.
Blockable:
* Obscenity is a blockable offense with no warnings required.
* Obscenity is a blockable offense with no warnings required.
* A pattern of continued use of vulgar or sexually based words is a blockable offense.
* A pattern of continued use of vulgar or sexually based words is a blockable offense.
* Unceasing reverts of articles is a blockable offense.
* Unceasing reverts of articles is a blockable offense.
* "tit for tat" editing is a blockable offense.
* "tit for tat" editing is a blockable offense.
* Argument without end, on points contrary to the Conservapedia philosophy, is a blockable offense.
* Argument without end, on points contrary to the Conservapedia philosophy, is a blockable offense.
* Repeated name calling and insults are blockable offenses.
* Repeated name calling and insults are blockable offenses.