Changes

Line 25: Line 25:  
Is this article semi-protected like on Wikipedia, or is it fully protected so only admins can edit? I also added back the "Issues" section as it was removed for some reason. [[User:AcomaMagic|AcomaMagic]] 14:48, 18 August 2012 (EDT)
 
Is this article semi-protected like on Wikipedia, or is it fully protected so only admins can edit? I also added back the "Issues" section as it was removed for some reason. [[User:AcomaMagic|AcomaMagic]] 14:48, 18 August 2012 (EDT)
 
:Evolutionism is pseudoscience. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:01, 8 January 2013 (EST)
 
:Evolutionism is pseudoscience. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:01, 8 January 2013 (EST)
 +
 +
:::the other issue is the logic of the statement that the most prominent advocates for evolution since world war 2 are atheists and further suggestion it's an atheistic thing. If we use the same logic we can conclude that Creationism (especially Young Earth Creationism) we can conclude the most vocal opponents of Evolution are Theists and opposition to Evolution is mostly based on religion. The problem here is the implication considering (unless i'm mistaken, I need to research more before i can make any sort of blanket statement) there are '''far''' more Theistic Evolutionists than there are Atheistic Creationists it's misleading to suggest that Evolution is based on Atheism. --DavidS 10:39, 26 March 2013 (EDT)
    
==Popper Quote==
 
==Popper Quote==
238

edits