Changes

'''Evolution of the gaps''' are dogmatic inferences to adaptive [[Logic of possibility|just-so stories]], stated with absolute conviction and marked with an extensive usage of [[buzzword]] 'evolution' serving as camouflage for complete lack of any [[explanation in science|scientific explanation]] or [[scientific observation|observational]] [[scientific evidence|evidence]] for postulated unkown alien phenomena. For example, [[Stephen Jay Gould]] admitted his own functionalist biases as he was once criticized by [[Francis Crick]] for hastily attributing a certain phenomenon to evolution, expressed in form of an adaptive story invented with alacrity and agility, even prior to finding out the real mechanism behind it.<ref>{{cite book

'''Evolution of the gaps''' are dogmatic inferences to adaptive [[Logic of possibility|just-so stories]], stated with [[Goebbels' maxim|absolute conviction]] and marked with an extensive usage of [[buzzword]] 'evolution' that serves as [[fog displacement|camouflage]] for complete lack of any [[explanation in science|scientific explanation]] or [[scientific observation|observational]] [[scientific evidence|evidence]] for postulated unknown alien [[phenomenon|phenomena]] under the investigation. For example, [[Stephen Jay Gould]] admitted his own functionalist biases as he was once criticized by [[Francis Crick]] for hastily attributing a certain phenomenon to evolution, expressed in form of an adaptive story invented with alacrity and agility, even prior to finding out the real mechanism behind it.<ref>{{cite book

|author=Stephen J. Gould

|author=Stephen J. Gould

|title=Adam’s Navel

|title=Adam’s Navel

|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=e-FTSHPpuAAC&q=Gould+Adam%E2%80%99s+Navel&dq=Gould+Adam%E2%80%99s+Navel&hl=en&sa=X&ei=GF8OUbjICuSn4ATLi4G4DQ&redir_esc=y

|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=e-FTSHPpuAAC&q=Gould+Adam%E2%80%99s+Navel&dq=Gould+Adam%E2%80%99s+Navel&hl=en&sa=X&ei=GF8OUbjICuSn4ATLi4G4DQ&redir_esc=y

|quote=I well remember something that [[Francis Crick]] said to me many years ago, when my own functionalist biases were strong. He remarked, in response to an adaptive story I had invented with alacrity and agility to explain the meaning of repetitive DNA: ‘''Why do you evolutionists always try to identify the value of something '''before you know how it is made'''''?’

|quote=I well remember something that [[Francis Crick]] said to me many years ago, when my own functionalist biases were strong. He remarked, in response to an adaptive story I had invented with alacrity and agility to explain the meaning of repetitive DNA: ‘''Why do you evolutionists always try to identify the value of something '''before you know how it is made'''''?’

|note=The quote seems to be missing at google books hence the edition obviously matters}}</ref>

|note=The quote seems to be missing at google books hence the edition obviously matters}}</ref> Szostak provided the following explanation why evolutionists are condemned to make the frequent inferences to evolution of the gap: As they do not feel smart enough to design things, they prefer to resort to alien unknown mechanism of evolution "to do the hard work" and only afterwards they attempt to figure out what happened.<ref>{{cite web |title=Artificial Life Closer Than You Think |author= |publisher=cbsnews; originally The Associated Press|date=February 11, 2009 |url=http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-205_162-3183953.html|quote="We aren't smart enough to design things, we just let evolution do the hard work and then we figure out what happened," Szostak said.}}</ref>

==Typical examples==

==Typical examples==