Difference between revisions of "Talk:Homosexual attraction"
From Conservapedia
(memes) |
(→Memes) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Memes== | ==Memes== | ||
"Considering genes aren't the source of this attraction, what accounts for this unnatural desire?" Memes would be the other logical possibility, would they not? [[User:Dhdidnac|Dhdidnac]] 08:32, 8 January 2014 (EST) | "Considering genes aren't the source of this attraction, what accounts for this unnatural desire?" Memes would be the other logical possibility, would they not? [[User:Dhdidnac|Dhdidnac]] 08:32, 8 January 2014 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :These feelings are completely natural. Everyone has had them and most people experiment at some point in their teens or early twenties. What makes it unnatural is when you continue to act on said feelings and insist they are "normal." The root cause is sin and the Devil, not Grumpy Cat. [[User:JohnBD|JohnBD]] 12:59, 8 January 2014 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:59, January 8, 2014
Why is it that "The study of it has been somewhat taboo since the mid-1970s"? Dhdidnac 20:04, 7 January 2014 (EST)
- Liberal denial perhaps? JohnBD 23:14, 7 January 2014 (EST)
Memes
"Considering genes aren't the source of this attraction, what accounts for this unnatural desire?" Memes would be the other logical possibility, would they not? Dhdidnac 08:32, 8 January 2014 (EST)
- These feelings are completely natural. Everyone has had them and most people experiment at some point in their teens or early twenties. What makes it unnatural is when you continue to act on said feelings and insist they are "normal." The root cause is sin and the Devil, not Grumpy Cat. JohnBD 12:59, 8 January 2014 (EST)
