Difference between revisions of "User talk:PeterKa"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 19: Line 19:
 
Contents of Republic of China article moved to [[Taiwan]]; please make necessary corrections as you see fit.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 01:11, 7 January 2014 (EST)
 
Contents of Republic of China article moved to [[Taiwan]]; please make necessary corrections as you see fit.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 01:11, 7 January 2014 (EST)
 
:Cool. Will do. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] 01:42, 7 January 2014 (EST)
 
:Cool. Will do. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] 01:42, 7 January 2014 (EST)
 +
 +
== Quick note ==
 +
 +
I notified some Admins about the unlocking of the articles. I have nothing further to say about this matter. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 03:15, 30 January 2014 (EST)
 +
:Um, ah....you are certainly being very mysterious. Welcome back? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] 07:18, 30 January 2014 (EST)

Revision as of 14:16, January 31, 2014


Welcome!

Hello, PeterKa, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, PeterKa!


Joaquín Martínez 21:47, 25 January 2014 (EST)

We don't allow copying from other sources, unless the contributor wrote the material that was published at the other source. Are you the original author of No Gun Ri?--Andy Schlafly 23:50, 15 December 2013 (EST)

Yes. I am. The material was on Wikipedia years ago. But the current No Gun Ri article is quite different. PeterKa 00:02, 16 December 2013 (EST)
OK, thanks for your answer.--Andy Schlafly 09:26, 16 December 2013 (EST)
It is the same story with Roman Warm Period. I wrote it a while back for Wikipedia, but later a liberal editor came along and revised the POV. PeterKa 20:33, 16 December 2013 (EST)

Nuclear option

I see that I may have disparaged your writing style. No offense was intended. You made a great improvement to an earlier version. It seems that we each have our pet peeves: you believe a definition shouldn't say what some people may think about the consequences of something; it should say what that something is. And I have a peeve about "when". Other than that, you write well. SamHB 22:40, 22 December 2013 (EST)

I rewrote the opening and added additional material. Tell me what you think. PeterKa 21:20, 1 January 2014 (EST)

Taiwan

Contents of Republic of China article moved to Taiwan; please make necessary corrections as you see fit. Karajou 01:11, 7 January 2014 (EST)

Cool. Will do. PeterKa 01:42, 7 January 2014 (EST)

Quick note

I notified some Admins about the unlocking of the articles. I have nothing further to say about this matter. Conservative 03:15, 30 January 2014 (EST)

Um, ah....you are certainly being very mysterious. Welcome back? PeterKa 07:18, 30 January 2014 (EST)