Changes

Line 79: Line 79:     
:Could you please revert the [[macroevolution]] article to the way it was before it was submitted to the panel?  I left you a diff on the talk page.  I understood that this was the policy regarding the panel - at least that's how it was with [[evolution]].-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 11:52, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:Could you please revert the [[macroevolution]] article to the way it was before it was submitted to the panel?  I left you a diff on the talk page.  I understood that this was the policy regarding the panel - at least that's how it was with [[evolution]].-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 11:52, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::I really don't see why this should be done. The article in its present state is perfectly acceptable. Also, I don't know of the policy you speak of. Can you point it out? Thanks [[User:CPWebmaster|CPWebmaster]] 12:12, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, oversight, Administrators
930

edits