Difference between revisions of "Miranda v. Arizona"
From Conservapedia
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | ''Miranda v. Arizona'', 384 U.S. 436 (1966), was a landmark decision by the [[Warren Court]] requiring the police to warn suspects of their rights before conducting custodial interrogations. These warnings, known as the "Miranda warnings," include: | |
:the right to remain silent | :the right to remain silent | ||
Revision as of 20:08, April 15, 2007
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), was a landmark decision by the Warren Court requiring the police to warn suspects of their rights before conducting custodial interrogations. These warnings, known as the "Miranda warnings," include:
- the right to remain silent
- the right to have an attorney presented
- the right to have an attorney appointed if desired
- the right to know that anything said can and will be used against the accused
Conservatives objected strenuously to this decision, which freed many criminals who had not received these warnings.[Citation Needed]