Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:AFD Homer Simpson"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
:: Show me that ''The Simpsons'' will be a TV classic, and define for me how you would judge a classic as worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia, and I'll reconsider.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 12:04, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:: Show me that ''The Simpsons'' will be a TV classic, and define for me how you would judge a classic as worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia, and I'll reconsider.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 12:04, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::Can you name another television entertainment show that has been on for 18 seasons?  [[User:Sterile|Sterile]] 12:27, 16 April 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 16:27, April 16, 2007

No intellectual content I'd go careful with that. You might end up having to AFD many other articles too. WhatIsG0ing0n 10:07, 16 April 2007 (EDT)

Since when do encyclopedias only contain "intellectual content"? By definition an encyclopedia contains information on as much as possible --Pacman 10:11, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
That's not accurate. An encyclopedia contains information that is within a definable scope. The definition of that scope is the sole prerogative of its senior editors.
Wikipedia might want to do a page on every silly TV show that has ever released. But at Conservapedia, we have the right to be a tad more selective.
Show me that The Simpsons will be a TV classic, and define for me how you would judge a classic as worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia, and I'll reconsider.--TerryHTalk 12:04, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
Can you name another television entertainment show that has been on for 18 seasons? Sterile 12:27, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia_talk:AFD_Homer_Simpson&oldid=110935"