SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 14:
Line 14: +
→90/10
:::::"So in general, if a user asks valuable questions on a talkpage which result in a more balanced article, he can still be blocked for violating the 90/10 rule?" If the vast majority of his edits are to talk page then he will be blocked, no matter how "useful" his edits are. Why do you think it's called 90/10? - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 12:58, 4 March 2013 (EST)
:::::"So in general, if a user asks valuable questions on a talkpage which result in a more balanced article, he can still be blocked for violating the 90/10 rule?" If the vast majority of his edits are to talk page then he will be blocked, no matter how "useful" his edits are. Why do you think it's called 90/10? - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 12:58, 4 March 2013 (EST)
::I am certain when Mr. Schlafly created the rule, he intended it to be followed in spirit, not to use it as a tool to bully others into shutting up. [[User:Brenden|brenden]] 13:44, 4 March 2013 (EST)
::I am certain when Mr. Schlafly created the rule, he intended it to be followed in spirit, not to use it as a tool to bully others into shutting up. [[User:Brenden|brenden]] 13:44, 4 March 2013 (EST)
:::This is very very old news at this point, but it might interest all parties to be aware that these "warnings" came from a user (Markman) who was later banned for outrageously destructive behavior. And I can tell you from my private email discourse with him that he was a totally unrepentant "recreational vandal" of the worst kind. So all this was a clear case of bullying and abuse of (wrongly conferred) power. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 19:45, 18 October 2014 (EDT)
==Ruth==
==Ruth==
Fixed whatever typos I could find, sorry for the misunderstanding. - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 09:37, 26 June 2013 (EDT)
Fixed whatever typos I could find, sorry for the misunderstanding. - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 09:37, 26 June 2013 (EDT)