Changes

535 bytes added ,  02:42, April 17, 2007
no edit summary
Line 49: Line 49:     
::::Well they have so-called "motor-voter" laws that enable people who get driver's licenses to register to vote.<br>Perhaps they could draft a "motor-toter" law, to issue every driver a handgun? Carjackings would go WAY down.[[User:Rob Pommer| Rob Pommer]]<sub>[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|talk]]</sub>
 
::::Well they have so-called "motor-voter" laws that enable people who get driver's licenses to register to vote.<br>Perhaps they could draft a "motor-toter" law, to issue every driver a handgun? Carjackings would go WAY down.[[User:Rob Pommer| Rob Pommer]]<sub>[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|talk]]</sub>
 +
 +
The argument that criminals would still get guns if they wanted them has some foundation in logic, however, it has no foundation statistically.  A comparison to England will suffice.  It bears out the conclusion that while some criminals still get guns, it is fewer - the mental & physical block of having to break another law just to get a gun actually deters gun crime :-) -'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 22:42, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
2,732

edits