Changes

517 bytes added ,  13:19, January 2, 2015
→‎Project: running User:Historybuff was against Conservapedia's guidelines, and the smokescreen which you put up here won't change this fact.
Line 107: Line 107:     
:::As far as the meritocracy issue, the User: Conservative account produces articles that are useful and of interest to the public, well-researched, accurate and scrupulously footnoted. The articles are some of the most popular articles at Conservapedia.  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 04:27, 2 January 2015 (EST)
 
:::As far as the meritocracy issue, the User: Conservative account produces articles that are useful and of interest to the public, well-researched, accurate and scrupulously footnoted. The articles are some of the most popular articles at Conservapedia.  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 04:27, 2 January 2015 (EST)
 +
 +
::::*The problems which I mentioned above just increase if there are more than two editors
 +
::::*So, you decided what merits being "administrator" or having "checkuser" rights? Isn't that the kind of ''nomination'' which is explicitly frowned upon in the guidelines?
 +
::::*How many socks are there for your account? I repeat, running User:Historybuff was against Conservapedia's guidelines, and the smokescreen which you put up here won't change  this fact.
 +
::::--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 08:19, 2 January 2015 (EST)
    
== Happy New Year ==
 
== Happy New Year ==
    
The editors of the User: Conservative account wish you a happy new year. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 01:06, 2 January 2015 (EST)
 
The editors of the User: Conservative account wish you a happy new year. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 01:06, 2 January 2015 (EST)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023

edits