Changes

Conservapedia:Abuse (view source)

Revision as of 16:33, April 17, 2007

77 bytes added , 16:33, April 17, 2007

m

Line 17: Line 17:

#{{user|Nematocyte}} - warned not to annoy TK --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 12:19, 17 April 2007 (EDT)

:Ed, are you sure that TK has another problem with him? I am the one who has had problems with Nematocyte over my article [[Extraterrestrial life]].--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]][[User talk:TerryH|Talk]] 12:26, 17 April 2007 (EDT)

−

#

#:Vandalized Ronald Reagan, sock of Coolhandsluke --~ [[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 00:36, 17 April 2007 (EDT)

#:Ilovebeingconservative (Talk | contribs | block) (Latest: 04:28, 17 April 2007) (Earliest: 04:19, 17 April 2007) [2]

−

##

#{{user|RightWolf2}} - threats, no useful edits --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 18:43, 16 April 2007 (EDT)

#:: I vote for a block. I think he returned simply to threaten me, again. I've requested an explanation from him on his talk page. Who let him back? It's OK this time, but pretty soon we'll need some accountability for those who unblock someone who becomes a problem again.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:47, 16 April 2007 (EDT)

:::Didn't he admit to making overly polemic right-wing entries that he didn't really believe in himself awhile back to "test" the site? I remember getting into an argument with him about a month ago about his attempt to qualify Fred Phelps as a "leader in the pro-family movement". [[User:DanH|DanH]] 18:48, 16 April 2007 (EDT)

::::You remember right, Dan. He's problematic. --~ [[User:TK|TK]] [[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]] 19:26, 16 April 2007 (EDT)

−

#* 18:51, 21 March 2007 TimSvendsen (Talk | contribs | block) unblocked RightWolf2 (contribs)

#* 18:27, 21 March 2007 TK (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "RightWolf2 (contribs)" with an expiry time of 3 days (Disruption, Threats. I did this to take the responsibility off Hoji.)

Line 32: Line 29:

#{{user|ILikeCookies}} - not so much abusive edits as just plain fluff--doesn't quite seem appropriate. What does everybody think?

#*This edit to [[Dan Quayle]] wasn't too bad. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Dan_Quayle&diff=prev&oldid=110148]

−

~~#{{user|Save Our Values}}~~

#The 6 random hex digit sock perp is back: http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Log/newusers [[User:Myk|Myk]] 13:46, 13 April 2007 (EDT)

#{{user|Homeschool mom}} lays it on too thick - suspected parodist

Line 42: Line 38:

===Dealt with===

+

#{{user|Save Our Values}}

+

#*No contribs since 13 April --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 12:33, 17 April 2007 (EDT)

#{{user|AppliedFaith}} -trolling, see [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Holocaust&diff=prev&oldid=104416][http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Heterosexuality&diff=prev&oldid=104363], "sexual activity is always impure, even when conducted within marriage."

#*I gave him a question to answer at [[talk:Heterosexuality]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 16:37, 16 April 2007 (EDT)

Ed Poor

Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators

30,650

edits