Changes

5 bytes added ,  06:49, January 21, 2015
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
{{merge|Welfare reform}}
 
{{merge|Welfare reform}}
−
Brookings Institution analyst [[Ron Haskins]] said that if the administration "wanted to undermine the work requirement," the new policy "is a way to do it." [http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/08/26/the_truth_about_obama_and_welfare_reform_115208.html]
+
[[Brookings Institution]] analyst Ron Haskins said that if the administration "wanted to undermine the work requirement," the new policy "is a way to do it." [http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/08/26/the_truth_about_obama_and_welfare_reform_115208.html]
   −
Prof. [[Douglas Besharov]]of the University of Maryland said, "If I believed in the work requirements, I wouldn't put in language encouraging states to lift them all."
+
Prof. Douglas Besharov of the University of Maryland said, "If I believed in the work requirements, I wouldn't put in language encouraging states to lift them all."
    
One of the ways in which states could be allowed to “meet the work requirement” is by not meeting the work requirement, i.e., by sending out welfare checks without requiring that nearly half the recipients perform 30 hours of work-related activities (which is not a particularly burdensome standard to begin with). [http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/315206/who-racializes-welfare-reform-editors National Review]
 
One of the ways in which states could be allowed to “meet the work requirement” is by not meeting the work requirement, i.e., by sending out welfare checks without requiring that nearly half the recipients perform 30 hours of work-related activities (which is not a particularly burdensome standard to begin with). [http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/315206/who-racializes-welfare-reform-editors National Review]
Line 10: Line 10:  
[[Ann Coulter]] wrote
 
[[Ann Coulter]] wrote
 
:"What "every fair analyst" and "every fact checker" means when they call Romney's ad "false" is: We, the media, don't consider exempting welfare recipients from the requirement of having to work "gutting" the work requirements. [http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2012-08-29.html#read_more]
 
:"What "every fair analyst" and "every fact checker" means when they call Romney's ad "false" is: We, the media, don't consider exempting welfare recipients from the requirement of having to work "gutting" the work requirements. [http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2012-08-29.html#read_more]
−
[[category: welfare]]
+
 
 +
[[Category : Welfare State]]
SkipCaptcha
12,693

edits