Difference between revisions of "User talk:Geo.plrd"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Conservapedia:Abuse)
Line 32: Line 32:
 
==A Private Thank you==
 
==A Private Thank you==
 
For fixing up [[Nancy Reagan]].[[User:Rob Pommer| Rob Pommer]]<sub>[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|talk]]</sub>
 
For fixing up [[Nancy Reagan]].[[User:Rob Pommer| Rob Pommer]]<sub>[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|talk]]</sub>
 +
 +
== Conservapedia:Abuse ==
 +
 +
I didn't file the original complaint; I don't remember who did.  The complaint seemed to me to have validity, at least enough to be worth responding to -- it alleged specific violations of the commandments.  TK removed it without comment.  The original poster then posted to that effect in the 'dealt with' section; this time, TK removed it with a commit comment of "unsigned will be removed".  I took him at his implied word, and reposted the (accurate) 'no action taken' comment, this time signed.  TK removed it with no explanation.  I posted it a second time, hoping for at least an explanation for why it was removed. --[[User:Jtl|Jtl]] 21:25, 18 April 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 01:25, April 19, 2007

Geo.plrd

Archives
1 2 3

Current messages

Unblocking Users, Without Consult Or Notice....

I have asked before, nicely. Please stop. Andy concurs. Check if you must, and I know you will! :p --~ TK MyTalk 20:49, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

Proposed Block Policy

There has recently been some disagreement over blocks, so I have created a proposed block policy Tell me what you think. --CPAdmin1 23:23, 12 April 2007 (EDT)


Sysop Pledge

As my good deed of the day I am requesting that you place this template on your userpage. Participating sysops will earn my respect and gratitude. --BenjaminS 00:00, 13 April 2007 (EDT)

Sysop Pledge
As a Conservapedia Sysop, I will NEVER ARBITRARILY block anyone who is not in violation of the Conservapedia Commandments or related CP Guidelines.

Pledge

I have posted a version of the "Pledge" I can accept on my user page. One that includes the Admin guidelines Andy approved. --~ TK MyTalk 07:17, 14 April 2007 (EDT)

New Name

This is MountainDew's new name. DanH 17:22, 15 April 2007 (EDT)

A Private Thank you

For fixing up Nancy Reagan. Rob Pommertalk

Conservapedia:Abuse

I didn't file the original complaint; I don't remember who did. The complaint seemed to me to have validity, at least enough to be worth responding to -- it alleged specific violations of the commandments. TK removed it without comment. The original poster then posted to that effect in the 'dealt with' section; this time, TK removed it with a commit comment of "unsigned will be removed". I took him at his implied word, and reposted the (accurate) 'no action taken' comment, this time signed. TK removed it with no explanation. I posted it a second time, hoping for at least an explanation for why it was removed. --Jtl 21:25, 18 April 2007 (EDT)