Difference between revisions of "Epicurus"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 13: Line 13:
  
 
''Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then He is not omnipotent. Is He able, but not willing? Then He is malevolent. Is He both able and willing? Then why does evil exist? Is He neither able nor willing? Then why call Him God?''
 
''Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then He is not omnipotent. Is He able, but not willing? Then He is malevolent. Is He both able and willing? Then why does evil exist? Is He neither able nor willing? Then why call Him God?''
 +
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|-
 +
! Willing !! Able !! Response
 +
|-
 +
| No || No || TWhy call him God?
 +
|-
 +
| Yes || No || Not omnipotent.
 +
|-
 +
| No || Yes || Not benevolent.
 +
|-
 +
| Yes || Yes || Why is there evil?
 +
|}
  
 
To this day there have been no successful refutations of that statement.
 
To this day there have been no successful refutations of that statement.

Revision as of 23:42, December 17, 2015

Epicurus.gif

Epicurus of Sámos (341-270 B.C.) was an ancient Greek philosopher. He founded in the late fourth century B.C. the Epicureanism School.

He did not believe in any divine power; he taught that sensations of pleasure and pain are the measures of what is good and bad, and the absence of pain and fear leads to happiness (ataraxia). He recommended a state of satiation and tranquility surrounded by friends, as one of the main goal in life. Epicurus explicitly warned against the exceeding of Hedonism.

One of his late followers Jeremy Bentham, said that:

"Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain, and pleasure."

Epicurus is also an important figure in the development of the scientific method. He insisted that nothing should be accepted except that which has been sufficiently tested through direct observation and logical deduction.

He dismissed the notion of an omnipotent and benevolent God by stating:

Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then He is not omnipotent. Is He able, but not willing? Then He is malevolent. Is He both able and willing? Then why does evil exist? Is He neither able nor willing? Then why call Him God?

Willing Able Response
No No TWhy call him God?
Yes No Not omnipotent.
No Yes Not benevolent.
Yes Yes Why is there evil?

To this day there have been no successful refutations of that statement.

See also

External links