Changes

212 bytes added ,  13:08, April 5, 2016
Info added - basing this on recent experience
Line 41: Line 41:  
#Using non sequiturs in argument, such as responding to the point above that liberals over-rely on accusations of hypocrisy by citing an example of conservatives' observing [[liberal hypocrisy]].  But their example does not help their argument.  Quite the contrary, use of that example tends to prove that liberals do over-rely on accusations of hypocrisy (relativism).  Think about that.
 
#Using non sequiturs in argument, such as responding to the point above that liberals over-rely on accusations of hypocrisy by citing an example of conservatives' observing [[liberal hypocrisy]].  But their example does not help their argument.  Quite the contrary, use of that example tends to prove that liberals do over-rely on accusations of hypocrisy (relativism).  Think about that.
 
#Draw an analogy between opponents and racists, no matter how illogical
 
#Draw an analogy between opponents and racists, no matter how illogical
 +
#Deleting a comment, and with it the entire comment thread stemming from it, in an online article's comment section if the liberal realizes they have lost an argument they had with a conservative on that thread
 +
 
'''Economics'''
 
'''Economics'''
 
#Support of greater [[nanny state|bureaucratic control]] rather than more [[competition]] to address problems
 
#Support of greater [[nanny state|bureaucratic control]] rather than more [[competition]] to address problems
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
7,846

edits