Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
28 bytes added ,  06:46, July 12, 2016
clean up & uniformity
Line 65: Line 65:  
Another difference is that, at least in the classical Semitic languages, [[verb]]s were conjugated for [[aspect (grammar)|aspect]] (perfect or imperfect) rather than tense.  By contrast, Indo-European languages are known for verb conjugations that distinguish both aspect and tense.  However, modern Semitic languages have developed ways to distinguish tense as well.  For example, in Modern Hebrew, the old perfect and imperfect aspects are used as past and future tenses, respectively, while the present tense is based on a [[participle]].
 
Another difference is that, at least in the classical Semitic languages, [[verb]]s were conjugated for [[aspect (grammar)|aspect]] (perfect or imperfect) rather than tense.  By contrast, Indo-European languages are known for verb conjugations that distinguish both aspect and tense.  However, modern Semitic languages have developed ways to distinguish tense as well.  For example, in Modern Hebrew, the old perfect and imperfect aspects are used as past and future tenses, respectively, while the present tense is based on a [[participle]].
   −
==See Also==
+
==See also==
    
*[[Hebrew]]
 
*[[Hebrew]]
Line 73: Line 73:  
*[[First Century Aramaic Jewish Christian Gospel and poetry]]
 
*[[First Century Aramaic Jewish Christian Gospel and poetry]]
 
*[[Essay: Christians and the Law of Moses]]
 
*[[Essay: Christians and the Law of Moses]]
 +
 +
==References==
 +
{{Reflist}}
    
[[Category:Semitic Languages| ]]
 
[[Category:Semitic Languages| ]]
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, Bots, edit
57,719

edits

Navigation menu