Difference between revisions of "Wetland"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎top: clean up & uniformity)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
−
A '''Wetland''' is an area that is wet due to a close relationship to a body of [[water]] or groundwater, or a land area that is flooded regularly.  Wetlands support [[vegetation]] adapted for life in saturated soil conditions.<ref>http://www.nwrc.usgs.gov/fringe/glossary.html</ref>  Frequently a centerpiece in Property Rights fights, a long running case, Rapanos v. US reached the US Supreme Court with a victory for landowner John Rapanos in 2006, limiting the Federal Governments reach on non navigable waterways and adjacent wetlands. <ref>[http://wetlandresearch.com/wiki/index.php?title=Rapanos_v._US Rapanos v. US Wetlands]</ref>
+
A '''Wetland''' is an area that is wet due to a close relationship to a body of [[water]] or groundwater, or a land area that is flooded regularly.  Wetlands support [[vegetation]] adapted for life in saturated soil conditions.<ref>http://www.nwrc.usgs.gov/fringe/glossary.html</ref>  Frequently a centerpiece in Property Rights fights, a long running case, Rapanos v. US reached the US Supreme Court with a victory for landowner John Rapanos in 2006, limiting the Federal Governments reach on non navigable waterways and adjacent wetlands.<ref>[http://wetlandresearch.com/wiki/index.php?title=Rapanos_v._US Rapanos v. US Wetlands]</ref>
  
 
Many wetlands are seen as reserves for wildlife by environmentalist [[liberal]]s who want to stagnate economic growth by preventing development on them.
 
Many wetlands are seen as reserves for wildlife by environmentalist [[liberal]]s who want to stagnate economic growth by preventing development on them.

Latest revision as of 21:40, July 13, 2016

A Wetland is an area that is wet due to a close relationship to a body of water or groundwater, or a land area that is flooded regularly. Wetlands support vegetation adapted for life in saturated soil conditions.[1] Frequently a centerpiece in Property Rights fights, a long running case, Rapanos v. US reached the US Supreme Court with a victory for landowner John Rapanos in 2006, limiting the Federal Governments reach on non navigable waterways and adjacent wetlands.[2]

Many wetlands are seen as reserves for wildlife by environmentalist liberals who want to stagnate economic growth by preventing development on them.

References