Difference between revisions of "Second Law of Thermodynamics"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Added category)
(A message for Conservapedia)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
The '''Second Law of Thermodynamics''' is a statistical law of nature about the tendency of an isolated system towards disorder in the absence of intelligent intervention.  This principle correctly predicts that heat will tend not to flow from a cold body to a warmer one without work being done, e.g. by a [[refrigerator]]. It also predicts that "[t]he universe is constantly getting more disorderly!"<ref>The quotation is from Isaac Asimov, who continued to say "[v]iewed that way, we can see the second law all about us.  We have to [[work]] hard to straighten a room, but left to itself it becomes a mess again very quickly and very easily.  Even if we never enter it, it becomes dusty and musty.  How difficult to maintain houses, and machinery, and our bodies in perfect working order: how easy to let them deteriorate.  In fact, all we have to do is nothing, and everything deteriorates, collapses, breaks down, wears out, all by itself -- and that is what the second law is all about.” Isaac Asimov, Smithsonian Institute Journal, June 1970, p. 6.  Put in physics terminology, the Second Law states that the [[entropy]] of an [[closed system|isolated system]] never decreases.</ref>
+
You find this pointless?
  
−
The Second Law of Thermodynamics is the result of the intrinsic uncertainty in nature, manifest in [[quantum mechanics]], which is overcome only by intelligent intervention.
+
Well I'd care to disagree,
  
−
This law makes it impossible to build a [[perpetual motion machine]] - the increase in entropy inevitably derails the system even if energy remains constant.
+
Because every moment you spend reverting my work,
  
−
The Second Law of Thermodynamics disproves the [[atheistic]] [[Theory of Evolution]] and [[Theory of Relativity]], both of which deny a fundamental uncertainty to the physical world that leads to increasing disorder.
+
Is another moment you won't spend spewing your lies,
  
−
The second law can be expressed mathematically as:
+
Another moment you won't spend hurting people.
  
−
<math>\frac{dS_{universe}}{dt} \ge 0</math>
+
Because the one thing you've forgotten,
  
−
where <math> \frac{dS_{universe}}{dt}</math> is the rate of change of [[entropy]] of the [[universe]] with respect to time.
+
Is that every single person on this earth is human,
  
−
==Entropy and disorder ==
+
All sharing one base desire,
  
−
In this context "increasing disorder" means "that which happens if you let nature take its course."
+
To be accepted and loved in the Light they so cherish.  
−
Imagine your old room at your parent's house.  Remember how easy it was to let the room turn into a uniform mess (disorder) and remember how hard it was to clean it up until it fit a specific, non-uniform design (order). Not cleaning up would always result in an increase of entropy in your room!
 
  
−
Now, in nature there is no one to clean up the universe, only chances. The chance of something becoming orderly is a lot smaller than the chance of something becoming disorderly (since there are far more possible disorderly states to choose from).
+
But you, who choose to shout "faggot" at those men who hold their hands together while they walk down the sidewalk.  
  
−
Alternatively one could think of how difficult it is to construct a house of cards, while almost everything that happens in nature will result in its collapse.
+
What you've forgotten is those people are YOU,
  
−
On a universal scale a tidy room would be a universe which has pockets of above average concentrations of energy (if you - incorrectly - assume relativity [[E=mc²]] this includes matter as well.)
+
The same in every respect, except for one crucial detail,
−
A messy room would be a universe in which all energy is equally spread out.
 
  
−
The flow of energy (by heat exchange) to places with lower concentrations is called the "heat flow".
+
They have more Humanity than you will ever posses.
  
−
The often heard argument that this law disproves an eternal universe is true, since in that case maximum entropy would have been reached already. A counter-argument to this would be to suggest that the universe is still in the process of approaching maximum entropy.
+
So I ask you, servants of the Darkness,
  
−
==Reversibility and Irreversibility==
+
When will you give up your anger?
  
−
[[Reversible process|Reversibility]] is a theoretical concept related to the Second Law of Thermodynamics. A process is reversible if the net heat and work exchange between the system and the surroundings is zero for the process running forwards and in reverse. This means the process does not generate [[entropy]]. In reality, no process is completely reversible. Irreversibility is a quantity sometimes called "lost work" and is equal to the difference between a process' actual work and reversible work. Irreversibility is also equal to a process' entropy generation multiplied by a reference temperature.
+
When will you finally heed the calls of your brothers and sisters?
  
−
==Trend toward uniformity in the universe==
+
"We've moved on," they'll say "Let go of your childish hate, life is more than what you know."
  
−
The universe will always become increasingly uniform, that is: heat will spread until the entire universe has the temperature and energy level (in a closed system heat will always spread from a place where there is a lot of heat to a place where there is less until balance is achieved), forces will continue to work until a universal balance has been achieved.
+
Sometimes I wonder when that day will come,
  
−
In this final state the universe is one uniform space where nothing happens and no work (moving something) can be done since there are no above average concentrations of energy left.
+
When brother does not fight brother,
−
This state is called maximum entropy and is said to be in perfect disorder (although intuitively its uniformity would seem to be a state of perfect order) because it has become impossible to determine what happened in the past.  ''i.e.'' There are an infinite number of ways (histories of the universe) maximum entropy could have been reached.
 
  
−
==The types of systems governed by the Law==
+
When the mother doesn't weep for them, for they do not know what they do,
−
There is only one type of system that the Second Law of Thermodynamics applies to: an isolated system. An isolated system is one that does not exchange matter or energy with its surroundings.
 
  
−
The Second Law of Thermodynamics does not strictly apply to the following types of system:
+
When the sisters will not have to be the voice of calm in the family.
−
* Closed system - Exchanges energy, but not matter, with its surroundings
 
−
* Open system - Exchanges both matter and energy with its surroundings
 
  
−
The boundary of any system can always be expanded to produce an isolated system.
+
Sometimes I think that day will be a million years off,
  
−
==Liberal abuse of the second law of thermodynamics==
+
But when I see those two men holding hands on the sidewalk,
  
−
It has become common in recent years for [[Environmentalism|environmentalists]] to claim that the second law of thermodynamics implies limits to [[economic growth]]. Their reasoning is that because free energy in resources such as [[petroleum|oil]] decreases with time, then economic growth can only be finite. However, this simplistic [[liberal]] reasoning ignores the [[false zero-sum game|non-zero sum]] nature of [[free market economics]], whereby improvements in technology deliver gains for all at no further cost. Indeed, one of the most vital economic goods, knowledge, or more generally information, can be said to be free from thermodynamic limitations entirely.<ref>[http://www.discovery.org/a/2053] Discovery Institute cofounder and futurist George F. Gilder put it eloquently as follows: ''Gone is the view of a thermodynamic world economy, dominated by "natural resources" being turned to entropy and waste by human extraction and use. Once seen as a physical system tending toward exhaustion and decline, the world economy has clearly emerged as an intellectual system driven by knowledge.''</ref> Liberals also vastly exaggerate the limitations that [[natural resources]] impose on human economies. Some estimate that the [[Earth]] can harbor 100 billion people. God Himself gives His explicit assurance that the Earth will be generous as long as the human race exists in [[Genesis]]: "And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth." (Gen. 1:28, KJV)
+
I think that day might be sooner than I expected.
−
 
 
−
== Creation Ministries International on the second law of thermodynamics and evolution ==
 
−
 
 
−
[[Image:Jonathansafarti.jpg|thumbnail|right|250px|right|[[Jonathan Sarfati]] ]]
 
−
''See also:'' [[Creation Ministries International on the second law of thermodynamics|Creation Ministries International on the second law of thermodynamics and evolution]]
 
−
 
 
−
[[Creation Ministries International]] has a great wealth of information on why the second law of thermodynamics is incompatible with the [[evolution]]ary [[paradigm]].
 
−
 
 
−
Some of their key resources on this matter are:
 
−
 
 
−
*[http://creation.com/the-second-law-of-thermodynamics-answers-to-critics The Second Law of Thermodynamics: Answers to Critics] by Dr. [[Jonathan Sarfati]]
 
−
 
 
−
*[http://creation.com/thermodynamics-and-order-questions-and-answers Thermodynamics Questions and Answers]
 
−
 
 
−
*[http://creation.com/thermodynamics-and-evolution Thermodynamics and evolution]
 
−
 
 
−
*[http://creation.com/some-thermodynamics-criticisms-and-answers Some thermodynamics criticisms — and answers]
 
−
 
 
−
Evolutionists and other scientists claim that these resources misrepresent the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
 
−
== The 1st and 2nd law of thermodynamics and the universe having a beginning ==
 
−
 
 
−
''See also:'' [[Atheism and the origin of the universe]]
 
−
 
 
−
According to Ohio State University professor Patrick Woodward, the [[First Law of Thermodynamics]] "simply states that energy can be neither created nor destroyed (conservation of energy)."<ref>[https://chemistry.osu.edu/~woodward/ch121/ch5_law.htm 1st Law of Thermodynamics], Ohio State University, Professor Pat Woodward (teaches for the Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry [https://chemistry.osu.edu/faculty/woodward])</ref>
 
−
 
 
−
The [[Christian apologetics]] website ''Why believe in God?'' declares about the Second Law of Thermodynamics:
 
−
{{cquote|The second law of thermodynamics, or the law of increased [[entropy]], says that over time, everything breaks down and tends towards disorder - entropy!  Entropy is the amount of UNusable energy in any systems; that system could be the earth's environment or the universe itself.  The more entropy there is, the more disorganisation and chaos. 
 
−
 
 
−
Therefore, if no outside force is adding energy to an isolated system to help renew it, it will eventually burn out (heat death).  This can be applied to a sun as well as a cup of tea - left to themselves, both will grow cold.  You can heat up a cold tea, you cannot heat up a cold sun.  NOTE: when a hot tea in an air tight room goes cold (loses all it's energy) not only do we NOT expect the process to reverse by natural causes (ie. the tea will get hot again), but both room temp and tea temp will be equal.  Keep that in mind as you read the next paragraph.
 
−
 
 
−
Look at it like this, because the energy in the universe is finite and no new energy is being added to it (1st law), and because the energy is being used up (2nd law), the universe cannot be infinite.  If our universe was infinite but was using up a finite supply of energy, it would have suffered 'heat death' a long time ago!  If the universe was infinite all radioactive atoms would have decayed and the universe would be the same temperature with no hot spots, no bright burning stars.  Since this is not true, the universe must have begun a finite time ago.<ref>[http://www.whybelieveingod.net/istheuniverseinfinite.htm Is the Universe Infinite?  Past beliefs and implications], Why believe in God? website</ref>}}
 
−
 
 
−
Thus, the First Law of Thermodynamics and the Second Law of Thermodynamics point to the [[universe]] having a beginning.<ref>
 
−
*[http://www.creationencounter.com/space/lawsofscience.php CAN LAWS OF SCIENCE EXPLAIN THE ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE?]
 
−
*[http://cavern.uark.edu/~cdm/creation/universeorigin.htm Evidence for the Supernatural Creation of the Universe] by Patrick R. Briney, Ph.D.
 
−
*[http://www.apologeticspress.org/apcontent.aspx?category=9&article=3704 The Laws of Thermodynamics Don't Apply to the Universe!] by Jeff Miller, Ph.D.
 
−
*[http://www.apologeticspress.org/apcontent.aspx?category=9&article=2106 God and the Laws of Thermodynamics: A Mechanical Engineer’s Perspective] by Jeff Miller, Ph.D.
 
−
*[http://creation.com/if-god-created-the-universe-then-who-created-god If God created the universe, then who created God?] by Jonathan Sarfati, Ph.D.
 
−
*[http://creation.com/eternal-universe Has the universe always existed?]</ref> However, the statistical nature of the second law mean that it is not firmly true.
 
−
 
 
−
== The 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics, theism and the origins of the universe ==
 
−
 
 
−
In the articles below, [[Theism|theists]] point out that the First Law of Thermodynamics and the Second Law of Thermodynamics point to the universe having a divine origin:
 
−
 
 
−
*[http://www.creationencounter.com/space/lawsofscience.php Can the laws of science explain the origin of the universe?]
 
−
 
 
−
*[http://cavern.uark.edu/~cdm/creation/universeorigin.htm Evidence for the Supernatural Creation of the Universe] by Patrick R. Briney, Ph.D.
 
−
 
 
−
*[http://www.apologeticspress.org/apcontent.aspx?category=9&article=3704 The Laws of Thermodynamics Don't Apply to the Universe!] by Jeff Miller, Ph.D.
 
−
 
 
−
*[http://www.apologeticspress.org/apcontent.aspx?category=9&article=2106 God and the Laws of Thermodynamics: A Mechanical Engineer’s Perspective] by Jeff Miller, Ph.D.
 
−
 
 
−
*[http://creation.com/if-god-created-the-universe-then-who-created-god If God created the universe, then who created God?] by Jonathan Sarfati, Ph.D.
 
−
 
 
−
*[http://creation.com/eternal-universe Has the universe always existed?]
 
−
 
 
−
== See also ==
 
−
 
 
−
*[[Genetic entropy]]
 
−
*[http://www.livescience.com/50941-second-law-thermodynamics.html http://www.livescience.com/50941-second-law-thermodynamics.html]
 
−
*[[Essay:Commentary on Conservapedia's article on the second law of thermodynamics]]
 
−
 
 
−
==References==
 
−
<references/>
 
−
 
 
−
[[Category:Physics]]
 
−
[[Category:Thermodynamics]]
 
−
[[Category:Second Law of Thermodynamics]]
 

Revision as of 00:31, September 9, 2016

You find this pointless?

Well I'd care to disagree,

Because every moment you spend reverting my work,

Is another moment you won't spend spewing your lies,

Another moment you won't spend hurting people.

Because the one thing you've forgotten,

Is that every single person on this earth is human,

All sharing one base desire,

To be accepted and loved in the Light they so cherish.

But you, who choose to shout "faggot" at those men who hold their hands together while they walk down the sidewalk.

What you've forgotten is those people are YOU,

The same in every respect, except for one crucial detail,

They have more Humanity than you will ever posses.

So I ask you, servants of the Darkness,

When will you give up your anger?

When will you finally heed the calls of your brothers and sisters?

"We've moved on," they'll say "Let go of your childish hate, life is more than what you know."

Sometimes I wonder when that day will come,

When brother does not fight brother,

When the mother doesn't weep for them, for they do not know what they do,

When the sisters will not have to be the voice of calm in the family.

Sometimes I think that day will be a million years off,

But when I see those two men holding hands on the sidewalk,

I think that day might be sooner than I expected.