Changes

623 bytes added ,  05:18, April 26, 2007
I further defined the definition of evolution
Line 182: Line 182:  
Is there anybody in there?  I posted two questions above and have received no response.  --[[User:Horace|Horace]] <sup>[[Conservapedia:Requests_for_adminship#Support_2|Vote Horace for sysop]]</sup> 20:17, 22 April 2007 (EDT)
 
Is there anybody in there?  I posted two questions above and have received no response.  --[[User:Horace|Horace]] <sup>[[Conservapedia:Requests_for_adminship#Support_2|Vote Horace for sysop]]</sup> 20:17, 22 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:So did I. --[[User:Hacker|Hacker]]<sup><code>([[User talk:Hacker|Write some code]] • [[Conservapedia:Requests for adminship#Support|Support my RfA]])</code></sup> 18:01, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:So did I. --[[User:Hacker|Hacker]]<sup><code>([[User talk:Hacker|Write some code]] • [[Conservapedia:Requests for adminship#Support|Support my RfA]])</code></sup> 18:01, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== I further defined the definition of evolution ==
 +
 +
I realize that the "defining of what evolution is" is a issue the panel is discussiong.
 +
 +
Here is a revision of the article that was recently made:
 +
 +
"Today advocates of evolution no longer adhere to "natural selection" as the definition of evolution, but rather define it simply as "change over time" in the gene pool of a population over time through such processes as mutation, natural selection, and genetic drift. [3]"
 +
 +
I think now that what the theory of evolution is has now been adequately explained. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 01:18, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,584

edits